What's on Practical Law?

Negligence: limitation period - knowledge required to start time running

Practical Law UK Legal Update 2-202-0793 (Approx. 4 pages)

Negligence: limitation period - knowledge required to start time running

The House of Lords in Haward and others v Fawcetts considered the three year limitation period prescribed by section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980 (which provides for an extension of the usual six year limitation period in certain negligence actions where the relevant facts are not known at the date the cause of action accrues) and the extent of the knowledge required by the claimant to start the time period running. Their Lordships considered what was meant by the requirement in section 14A that the claimant had to know that the damage was attributable in whole or in part to the act of the defendant. Overturning a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal, the House of Lords held that for time to start to run the claimant must have knowledge of the "factual essence of the act or omission" which caused his loss. It was not necessary for the claimant to know the precise details of the alleged negligence or for him to conclusively identify that the defendant's acts or omissions were the cause of his loss. It was sufficient if the claimant had enough information to make it reasonable for him to commence investigations into the potential claim against the defendant; s14A gives the claimant three years to complete such investigations.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 2-202-0793
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Law stated as at 01-Mar-2006
Resource Type Legal update: archive
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Scotland
  • Wales
Related Content